Skip to content
  • politics
  • entertainment
  • business
  • sports
  • Blog
Iuniversalpublisher.com

Iuniversalpublisher.com

letest update

  • Home
  • Toggle search form
3175 Z6svVu

Federal judge denies Trump bid to throw out documents prosecution

Posted on 4 April 2024 By No Comments on Federal judge denies Trump bid to throw out documents prosecution

Judge rejects defense’s argument based on Presidential Records Act claiming Trump could take documents when he left officeA federal judge refused Thursday to throw out the classified documents prosecution against Donald Trump, rejecting a defense argument that the case should be tossed because he was entitled as a former president to retain the records after he left office.Lawyers for Trump had cited a 1978 statute known as the Presidential Records Act in arguing that he was permitted to designate records from his time in office as personal and take them with him when he left the White House.Prosecutors on special counsel Jack Smith’s team vigorously opposed that argument, saying the statute had no relevance in a case concerning classified documents.US district judge Aileen Cannon, a Trump appointee, sided with the government in a three-page order, writing that the indictment makes “no reference to the Presidential Records Act, nor do they rely on that statute for purposes of stating an offense.”Trump faces 40 charges arising from his retention of classified information after leaving the White House and alleged obstruction of attempts to recover such records. He has pleaded not guilty. Continue reading…

Judge rejects defense’s argument based on Presidential Records Act claiming Trump could take documents when he left office

A federal judge refused Thursday to throw out the classified documents prosecution against Donald Trump, rejecting a defense argument that the case should be tossed because he was entitled as a former president to retain the records after he left office.

Lawyers for Trump had cited a 1978 statute known as the Presidential Records Act in arguing that he was permitted to designate records from his time in office as personal and take them with him when he left the White House.

Prosecutors on special counsel Jack Smith’s team vigorously opposed that argument, saying the statute had no relevance in a case concerning classified documents.

US district judge Aileen Cannon, a Trump appointee, sided with the government in a three-page order, writing that the indictment makes “no reference to the Presidential Records Act, nor do they rely on that statute for purposes of stating an offense.”

Trump faces 40 charges arising from his retention of classified information after leaving the White House and alleged obstruction of attempts to recover such records. He has pleaded not guilty.

Continue reading…

​

Blog

Post navigation

Previous Post: Madonna asks judge to toss lawsuit over late concert start time
Next Post: Democrats Seek to Turn Biden’s ‘Most Affordable’ Student Loan Relief Program Into Law

More Related Articles

wirestory 0d61aace4a137d059cb6dfdb29ecd29e 16x9 1600 As Halloween approaches, tourists visit a home with a gruesome past and tunnels said to be haunted Blog
abc news default 2000x2000 update 16x9 1600 bUNtG6 President Joe Biden ends his 2024 bid after a disastrous debate inflamed doubts he’s fit for four more years on the job Blog
Historic lunar mission likely won’t reach moon’s surface, company says Blog
2998 Hpm6ra The Harris campaign has seen a wave of celebrity support. But how helpful is it? Blog
Donald Trump doesn’t have stitches, but a “nice flesh wound,” Eric Trump says Blog
Former NOAA hurricane hunter unpacks the dangers of Milton Blog

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2026 Iuniversalpublisher.com.

Powered by PressBook Blog WordPress theme